Comparative analysis of various soft tissue augmentation technique effectiveness around implants

Relevance. Today soft tissue augmentation is performed with autogenous and xenografts to achieve optimal gingival parameters around implants. It worth noting the lack of clinical studies aimed at a comparative analysis postoperative condition patients aesthetic parameters. Purpose. The study evaluate advantages disadvantages collagen matrix autografts in dental Material methods. Thirty-two thickness deficiency intended implantation formed two groups: Group 1 had subepithelial connective graft (SCTG) during surgery, 2 xenogeneic (CM). In period, we assessed surgery duration, severity pain (VAS scale) ooedema, daily NSAID dose, quality life (OHIP-14), pink aesthetics (PES). Results. duration was 30.31 ± 6.98 (SD) 26.31 6.81 minutes Groups 2, respectively (p = 0.111). Patients group more pronounced pain. On day one after mean value 3.06 1.73 1.94 1.48 0.002). often took NSAIDs on days 3 surgery: 2.00 (Q1 1.00, Q3 3.00) 1.50 0.00, 2.00), respectively, than 2: 1.00 2.00) 0.00 1.00). showed collateral oedema (p<0.001). There no statistically significant difference reduction between both groups. results were better by shape alveolar ridge marginal level. colour tissues surgical area surrounding almost all patients. Conclusion. CM provides comfortable period but, however, leads ooedema. SCTG demonstrates best result treatment.